The Founders' Safeguard Against Tyranny: Rediscovering Checks and Balances

Summary: Have you ever wondered why the United States government seems designed to move slowly—why one branch so often blocks or questions another? That’s not inefficiency—it's genius.

By Amanda Monize, EZAZ.org Grassroots Strategy Director (AKA Grassroots Glow-Up Guru)

CIVICS - The Founders, having just broken free from the grip of a powerful monarchy, deliberately built a system that resists the concentration of power. If you've forgotten those high school civics lessons (and who hasn't in our busy world?), let's dust them off.

Understanding how our government is structured—and why—is essential to understanding how liberty is preserved.

This article offers a refresher on the structure of the federal government, the checks and balances built into it, and the purpose those boundaries serve in protecting “We the People” from centralized overreach.

A Republic by Design: Separation of Powers

The United States is a constitutional republic, not a pure democracy. In a pure democracy, a simple majority can rule unchecked, potentially trampling minority rights. The Founders were deeply wary of this risk, just as they were wary of unchecked executive power.

Drawing on Enlightenment thinkers such as Montesquieu, they divided federal power among three distinct branches—legislative, executive, and judicial. This separation isn't just organizational; it's a deliberate barrier against tyranny and ensures no one entity holds all the cards. 

As James Madison explained in Federalist No. 51, “Ambition must be made to counteract ambition.” In other words, power must be balanced by power.

The Three Branches and Their Roles

The Legislative Branch: Congress

Article I of the Constitution establishes Congress, the lawmaking branch. It is bicameral—made up of two chambers designed to represent the people in different ways.\

• The House of Representatives reflects population, with 435 members serving two‑year terms.

• The Senate represents the states equally, with two senators per state, each serving six‑year terms.

Congress writes and passes legislation, controls federal spending, declares war, and provides oversight of the executive branch. While powerful, Congress is not unchecked; it must work within the Constitution's limits. 

The Executive Branch: The President and Administration

Article II vests executive power in the President, elected every four years. This branch is responsible for enforcing the laws passed by Congress.

The executive branch includes the Vice President, Cabinet, and federal agencies such as the Department of Justice or the Environmental Protection Agency. The President is Commander in Chief of the armed forces, may sign or veto legislation, makes federal appointments, and negotiates treaties—but always subject to limits imposed by the other branches.

The Judicial Branch: The Courts

Article III establishes the judicial branch, headed by the Supreme Court and supported by lower federal courts created by Congress.

The courts interpret laws, resolve disputes, and determine whether laws or executive actions comply with the Constitution. Judges do not make laws, but they do ensure that the law respects constitutional boundaries and individual rights.

Checks and Balances: Power with Restraint

Checks and balances are the "rules of the game" that enforce this separation. Each branch has tools to oversee, limit, or override the others, creating a dynamic equilibrium–like a three-way tug-of-war where no side wins permanently—that's the point. Here's how it works in practice:

Legislative Checks

• Congress may override a presidential veto with a two‑thirds vote in both chambers.

• It controls federal spending—no federal program is funded without congressional approval.

• The House may impeach federal officials, and the Senate may remove them from office.

• The Senate confirms presidential appointments (i.e. federal judges and cabinet members) and ratifies treaties.

Executive Checks

• The President may veto legislation passed by Congress.

• Executive orders direct how existing laws are implemented, though they may be challenged in court.

• The President may grant pardons for federal offenses.

Judicial Checks

• Courts may declare laws or executive actions unconstitutional through judicial review, established in Marbury v. Madison (1803).

• This authority ensures that neither Congress nor the President exceeds constitutional limits or violates individual rights.

Moreover, the President nominates judges, but the Senate confirms them. Congress may restructure lower courts, yet judicial independence is protected through life tenure. Accountability and independence exist side by side.

The purpose? To limit centralized government. The Founders feared a king-like figure or mob rule, so they embedded these mechanisms to diffuse power. Without them, a charismatic leader could consolidate authority, or Congress could pass oppressive laws unchecked. Instead, the system forces compromise, deliberation, and respect for the rule of law—protecting the people from arbitrary decisions.

Why the Founders Insisted on Boundaries

The Founders’ caution was shaped by history and experience. They studied the collapse of the Roman Republic, the abuses of royal power in England, and their own grievances under King George III.

They understood that liberty is most threatened when power is centralized—whether in a single ruler, an unrestrained legislature, or an unaccountable judiciary. Checks and balances diffuse authority, slow decision‑making, and force debate and compromise.

This Structure Doesn’t Stop in Washington–it Shaped State 

Just as the federal government is divided into three branches, state governments follow a similar structure, with legislative, executive, and judicial branches defined by their own state constitutions.

These state-level checks and balances are not optional—they are a constitutional reflection of the same principles found in the federal government structure. 

In many cases, decisions that affect daily life most directly—education, elections, public safety, and local taxes—are shaped at the state and local level, under these same constraints.

Understanding how checks and balances operate in your state isn’t trivia; it’s the key to meaningful participation in the government closest to the people.

Why Civics Still Matters

In an era of rapid news cycles, executive action, and political frustration, checks and balances can feel like obstacles. But they are the very mechanisms that prevent overreach and protect individual liberty.

A healthy republic depends on an informed and engaged citizenry. Reading the Constitution, following how a bill becomes law, or attending a local meeting are not abstract exercises—they are acts of civic stewardship.

As Alexander Hamilton wrote, “The people are the only legitimate fountain of power.” Remembering how our system works is the first step toward ensuring that power remains where it belongs, in the hands of the people. 

The question is not whether checks and balances still matter. The question is whether we remember how to use them.

So, the next time you hear a headline, ask yourself: is this a federal, state, or local issue—and which branch is responsible?

About the Author: Amanda Monize, Grassroots Strategy Director at EZAZ.org, is a former teacher and Science Instructional Specialist. She joined EZAZ as an Arizona citizen seeking to understand local government, later volunteering in statewide grassroots campaigns and running for office. She designed and led civic education trainings across Arizona and serves as an elected official. Now leading EZAZ initiatives, she empowers citizens through organizing, education, and advocacy—believing an informed, active citizenry secures liberty.

________

EZcivics.org is funded by our readers. If you found this news brief educational, consider chipping in to fuel our work by going HERE.